>
Apply your personal expertise to this interdisciplinary skill.

How to Become a Prompt Engineer

''

Written by: Kara Coleman Fields

This article was originally posted in US News. Read more.

 

Presenting a generative AI program with information, a request or a problem to solve is called inputting a prompt. The better prompts you input, the better results you can expect to receive as output. But crafting a helpful prompt is more than simply telling a program to write a recipe using the ingredients in your refrigerator. Learning how to be good at engineering prompts involves a blend of human logic, communication, understanding patterns and bringing your personal knowledge to the table.

“Ultimately, AI is interdisciplinary,” says Lance Cummings, an English professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington who applies structured approaches from technical writing to creating prompts. “So to understand it, you have to understand it from different perspectives, and certainly to implement it. It’s not just going to be computer scientists out there making it happen.”

According to an April 2026 report from the National Association of Colleges and Employers, nearly a third of employers surveyed say they’re looking for early-career employees who can use artificial intelligence in their work. Sixty percent report assigning AI-related tasks to interns.

“Finding people who have the title purely ‘prompt engineer’ I would say is a rarer thing, in my experience,” says Jules White, a computer science professor at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee and senior adviser to the chancellor on generative AI in enterprise education. “You find lots of people who are effectively playing this role and using these skills, but they may have another name, like AI agent engineer or data scientist or data analyst.”

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects 34% growth – a numeric addition of 82,500 roles – for data scientists between 2024 and 2034. This eclipses the 3% projected growth for all occupations during the decade and reflects employers’ desire to make data-driven decisions. But due to AI’s applications in various disciplines, prompt engineering isn’t a skill exclusively for data scientists.

“Everybody’s going to have to be a prompt engineer to a degree, whether they like it or not, over the next 10 years,” White says. “Most jobs these days are difficult if you can’t read and write. It’s going to be as fundamental over time as reading and writing, your ability and skills with this.”

What Prompt Engineering Is

“To put it simply, prompt engineering is how people communicate with AI systems to get better, more accurate results,” says Yeqing Kong, an assistant professor of technical communication at the Georgia Institute of Technology’s School of Literature, Media and Communication.

Prompt engineering is not tinkering with keywords that will unlock a perfect response. Instead, it’s about providing the AI platform with the proper context and information, as well as recognizing patterns and revising prompts, to get the desired output.

It’s also typically a skill that employers look for as part of a larger skill set, rather than a role or job title itself.

Cummings prefers using the term “prompt design” instead of “prompt engineering.”

“Because really what we’re doing is designing natural language in ways that elicit appropriate responses from machines or AI,” he explains.

What Does a Prompt Engineer Do?

Martin Jones, a professor of artificial intelligence, law and ethics at Anderson University in South Carolina, likens engineering a generative AI prompt to assigning work to a teaching assistant. Jones says that if he gave generic instructions such as, “I want you to help me conduct some research,” he wouldn’t expect a good response because more specific instructions were lacking.

“They wouldn’t know,” says Jones, who is also associate dean of the university’s College of Business and Economics. “What research? Where should I go? Are there any limitations? What exactly do you want me to do? What do you not want me to do? The same is absolutely true with generative AI tools.”

Getting effective results would require sharing the research topic, telling the teaching assistant where they might find relevant information, and anything related that shouldn’t be included – for example, excluding articles published before 1990.

Jones suggests generative AI users “introduce” themselves to the bot as they train it; for example, “I’m a professor and I teach ethics” can help establish context for the requests the user might make.

White references someone he knows who has lengthy conversations with generative AI to establish not only what they’re looking for from the output, but also how to determine when the output is desirable.

“He starts by, let’s discuss the problem that we’re going to solve and the fundamental characteristics of the problem we’re trying to solve, how we might know if we’ve achieved the solution, and how we might go and benchmark the solution,” he says. “And he spends a ton of time doing that before he ever tries to solve the problem.”

While this type of thorough prework is a heavier lift upfront than going directly into inputting a question or command, it can lead to the AI bot producing more accurate results and possibly result in fewer revisions until the desired outcome is reached.